nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 01, 1-11
阈限的哲性和诗性
基金项目(Foundation): 国家社会科学基金重大项目“认知诗学研究与理论版图重构”(编号:20&ZD291);国家社会科学基金项目“认知女性视域下美国南方女作家的社会焦虑研究”(编号:19BWW074)
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
发布时间: 2025-12-22
出版时间: 2025-12-22
移动端阅读
摘要:

人类学的“阈限”作为一种特殊空间,具有过渡性、杂糅性、不确定性和无限可能性等基本特征。本雅明、福柯、德勒兹的哲性思想彰显了深厚的阈限基质。本雅明通过城市漫游的过渡性和不确定性来解构空间整体化的宏大叙事;福柯通过异托邦展示处于复杂权力知识网络中的特殊空间的居间性和杂糅性;德勒兹的“游牧思想”则涵盖了阈限的所有特征。在文学研究中,物理阈限和人物阈限较为常见。家居和公共空间的阈限性常表现为内外边界的模糊化,引发多重焦虑。在旅行、社会转型和后现代社会中,人典型地体现了阈限性。从空间设计到人物塑造,阈限性可有效扩展文本张力,从而引发多向度的阐释延伸。

Abstract:

In anthropology, liminality is a special space with fundamental features of transition, hybridity, uncertainty, and infinite possibilities. The philosophical thoughts of Walter Benjamin, Michel Foucault, and Gilles Deleuze highlight a profound liminal substratum. Benjamin dismantles the grand narrative of spatial integration through the transitional and uncertain nature of the urban wandering. Foucault demonstrates the intermediary and hybrid nature of some special spaces situated in a complex network of power knowledge. Deleuze's “nomadic thought” encompasses all the characteristics of liminality. In literary studies, physical liminality and character liminality are commonly seen. Liminality of domestic and public spaces is often manifested in the blurring of inner and outer boundaries, which may trigger multiple anxieties. In travel, social transformation, and post-modern society, people typically embody liminality. From spatial design to characterization, liminality can effectively expand textual tension to produce multi-directional interpretations.

参考文献

[1]Achilles, J.&Ina, B. Liminality and the Short Story:Boundary Crossing in American,Canadian, and British Writing[C]. New York:Routledge, 2015.

[2]Armstrong, I. Victorian Glassworks:Glass Culture and the Imagination 1830—1880[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2008.

[3]Armstrong, N. Imperialist nostalgia and Wuthering Heights[A]. In Linda H. Peterson(eds.)Wuthering Heights. Emily Bront?. Case Studies in Contemporary Criticism[C]. Boston and New York:Bedford and St. Martin’s, 1992:428-449.

[4]Bachelard, G. The Poetics of Space[M]. Boston:Beacon Press, 1994.

[5]Benjamin, W. A Berlin Chronicle[M]. New York:Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1978:3-60.

[6]Benjamin, W.莫斯科日记·柏林记事[M].潘小松译.北京:东方出版社,2001.

[7]Bogue, R.德勒兹论文学[M].石绘译.南京:南京大学出版社,2022.

[8]Brodersen, M.在不确定中游走:本雅明传[M].国荣译.北京:金城出版社,2013.

[9]Engebretson, A. Neither in nor out:the liminal spaces of Blood Meridian[J]. Southwestern American Literature, 2011, 36(3):9-18.

[10]Foucault, M.不同的空间[A].周宪译.激进的美学锋芒[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003:19-28.

[11]Gennep, A. V.过渡礼仪[M].张举文译.北京:商务印书馆,2019.

[12]Genette, G. Paratexts:Thresholds of Interpretation[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1997.

[13]Mukherji, S. Thinking on Threshold:The Poetics of Transitive Spaces[M]. New York:Anthem Press, 2013.

[14]Rozelle, L. Resurveying DeLillo’s“White Space on Map”:Liminality and communitas in Underworld[J]. Studies in the Novel, 2010, 42(4):443-452.

[15]Samuels, W. D. Liminality and the search for self in Song of Solomon[A]. Twayne’s United States Authors Series 559[C]. Boston, MA:Twayne Publishers, 1990:53-78.

[16]Silverman, K. The Threshold of the Visible World[M]. New York:Routledge, 1996.

[17]Tally, Jr.&Robert, T.空间性[M].方英译.北京:北京大学出版社,2021.

[18]Taylor-Ide&Jesse, O. Ritual and the liminality of sherlock holmes in“The Sign of Four” and“The Hound of the Baskervilles”[J]. English Literature in Transition 1880—1920, 2005, 48(2):55-70.

[19]Thomassen, B. Liminality and the Modern Living Through the In-Between[M]. Berlington:Ashgate Publishing Company, 2014.

[20]Turner, V.象征之林——恩登布人仪式散论[M].北京:商务印书馆,2018.

[21]Vine, S. Emily Bront?[M]. New York:Twayne, 1998.

[22]陈榕.野性的规训——解读R. L.斯蒂文森的《化身博士》[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2007(3):78-82.

[23]陈修斋译.莱布尼茨与克拉克论战书信集[M].北京:商务印书馆,2013.

[24]李永平,李泽涛.从阈限书写进入:文学人类学研究的一个视角[J].中国比较文学,2022(1):169-186.

[25]刘鲁蓉,黄忠.阈限的跨界性和创造力:论布莱恩·卡斯特罗跨国写作中的嗅觉景观[J].当代外国文学,2022(2):62-69.

[26]刘玉红.鲍比·安·梅森《在乡下》的阈限焦虑书写[J].当代外国文学,2022(3):14-21.

[27]麦永雄.德勒兹哲性诗学:跨语境理论意义[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2013.

[28]维克多·特纳.仪式过程:结构与反结构[M].黄剑波,柳博赟译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006.

[29]邢崇.后现代视域下本雅明消费文化理论研究[M].济南:山东人民出版社,2009.

基本信息:

中图分类号:I106

引用信息:

[1]刘玉红.阈限的哲性和诗性[J].当代外语教育,2025(01):1-11.

基金信息:

国家社会科学基金重大项目“认知诗学研究与理论版图重构”(编号:20&ZD291);国家社会科学基金项目“认知女性视域下美国南方女作家的社会焦虑研究”(编号:19BWW074)

发布时间:

2025-12-22

出版时间:

2025-12-22

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文
检 索 高级检索